UP Police Constable Recruitment: High Court Upholds Merit, Rescinds Bar on Reserved Candidates Scoring Above General Cutoff
How much it matters for each exam
- UP SI9/10
- UPPSC8/10
- UPPSC RO/ARO8/10
- UPSC7/10
- UPSSSC PET7/10
1At a glance
The Allahabad High Court has clarified a crucial principle for reservation in public employment: meritorious candidates from reserved categories (OBC, etc.) who score above the general/unreserved cutoff cannot be denied selection.
Merit Overrides Procedure
Reserved category candidates scoring above the general cutoff cannot be denied appointment, even if they claimed social reservation benefits.
SC Precedent Applied
The High Court applied the Supreme Court's 2020 'Saurabh Yadav' judgment, which invalidated the earlier 'Ajay Kumar' full bench ruling of Allahabad HC.
Retrospective Relief, Prospective Benefits
While candidates get appointment, seniority and financial benefits will be from the actual joining date, not from the original result date.
2Facts to remember
Tap a card to see the answer. Try to recall it first.
3Uttar Pradesh connection
Uttar Pradesh
Matters for these Uttar Pradesh exams:
UP SI 9/10UPPSC 8/10UPPSC RO/ARO 8/10UPSSSC PET 7/10
4Detailed analysis
Context / Background
This case stems from the 2018 UP Police constable recruitment where reserved category candidates (OBC women, ex-servicemen, freedom fighter dependents) were excluded from unreserved posts despite scoring above the general cutoff. The state government relied on the then-prevailing 'Ajay Kumar' full bench ruling of the Allahabad HC. The core issue was the interpretation of horizontal reservation and whether meritorious reserved candidates can be considered for general category posts.
Core Analysis & Implications
The High Court's dismissal of state appeals reinforces the Supreme Court's landmark 'Saurabh Yadav' principle. It establishes that a candidate from a reserved category who secures a higher score than the general cutoff must be considered for appointment under the general/unreserved category. This prevents the 'double penalty' where a candidate is first adjusted against a reserved post and then denied a general seat despite higher merit. The judgment underscores that reservation is a minimum guarantee, not a ceiling on opportunity.
Judicial Doctrine & Reasoning
The court invoked the doctrine that law declared by the Supreme Court operates retrospectively (has a 'retrospective effect'), unless explicitly made prospective. Since the SC in Saurabh Yadav invalidated the Ajay Kumar principle, it applied retrospectively. The court also dismissed the government's delay in filing appeals, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and the Supreme Court's general extension of deadlines during that period.
Future Outlook / Way Forward
This judgment sets a clear precedent for all future recruitments in Uttar Pradesh and similar cases in other states. It mandates recruiting agencies to first fill unreserved seats purely on merit, irrespective of a candidate's reserved status. The state government must now issue appointment letters to the affected candidates, though without backdated seniority. This aligns recruitment practices with the constitutional spirit of Articles 14, 15, and 16, promoting equality while recognizing merit.
5Background GK
Textbook concepts you need to understand this news
- Horizontal Reservation
- Reservation provided for specific categories (like women, ex-servicemen, persons with disabilities) within each vertical reservation category (SC, ST, OBC, General). It is applied separately and cuts across vertical categories.
- Doctrine of Prospective Overruling
- A judicial principle where a court's decision is applied only to future cases and not retrospectively. It is an exception to the normal rule that a court's declaration of law applies to all pending and past cases.
- Articles 15 & 16 of the Constitution
- Article 15 prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. Article 16 guarantees equality of opportunity in public employment. Clause (4) of Article 16 enables reservation for backward classes.
- Allahabad High Court
- The High Court for the state of Uttar Pradesh, with its seat at Prayagraj (Allahabad). It has a bench at Lucknow. It is one of the oldest high courts in India, established in 1866.
6How exams will ask this
- Data: 31,360 Civil Police and 18,208 PAC constable posts advertised on 16 Nov 2018.
- Legal Point: Supreme Court's 'Saurabh Yadav vs Uttar Pradesh State' judgment of December 2020.
- Principle: Reserved category candidates scoring above the general cutoff are eligible for unreserved posts.
Don't make this mistake!
Examiners may ask about the 'Ajay Kumar' case (the overruled Allahabad HC full bench ruling) as the incorrect precedent, or confuse the dates (2018 advertisement vs 2020 result vs 2020 SC judgment). They may also swap 'retrospective' and 'prospective' application of the judgment.
Write these in mains answers
"Merit within reservation," "creamy layer concept in vertical vs horizontal reservation," "constitutional balance between Articles 14, 15, and 16."
7Practice questions
Pick an answer, then read the explanation.
- Q1Easy
The Allahabad High Court, which delivered the judgment on UP Police recruitment, is the High Court for which Indian state?
Explanation: The Allahabad High Court is the High Court for the state of Uttar Pradesh. Its seat is at Prayagraj (formerly Allahabad), with a bench at Lucknow. The news article explicitly mentions the court in the context of a Uttar Pradesh government recruitment case.
- Q2Hard
Consider the following statements regarding the recent Allahabad High Court judgment on UP Police recruitment:
- 1.The court held that reserved category candidates who score above the general cutoff can be appointed against unreserved posts.
- 2.The judgment relied on the Supreme Court's ruling in the 'Ajay Kumar' case as the valid precedent.
- 3.The court dismissed the state government's appeals, citing delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic as not fatal to the candidates' claims.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct as per the core ruling. Statement 2 is incorrect because the 'Ajay Kumar' case was the overruled precedent; the High Court actually applied the Supreme Court's 'Saurabh Yadav' judgment. Statement 3 is correct as the article mentions the court set aside the technical objection of delay due to the pandemic. Hence, option C is correct.
- Q3Medium
According to the news, for how many posts of Civil Police Constables was the recruitment advertisement issued by Uttar Pradesh Police in 2018?
Explanation: The article clearly states that on 16 November 2018, an advertisement was issued for 31,360 Civil Police Constable and 18,208 PAC Constable posts. Therefore, the number of Civil Police Constable posts was 31,360. Option C is the total combined posts, which is a distractor.
- Q4Medium
What is the primary constitutional principle reinforced by the Allahabad High Court's judgment in the UP Police recruitment case?
Explanation: The core of the judgment is that if a candidate from a reserved category (OBC, etc.) secures marks higher than the cutoff for the general/unreserved category, they must be considered for appointment under the general category. This upholds the constitutional balance between equality of opportunity (Article 16) and provisions for reservation. The other options are either incorrect or secondary aspects mentioned in the article.
8All sources
Original28 October 2026 · Read story
Related stories
Stories from the last 30 days on the same topic, state or exams
Uttar Pradesh's Proposed Age Verification Guidelines: 4 Documents Under RTE Rules to Prevent POCSO Act Misuse
The Uttar Pradesh government has proposed new guidelines to verify the age of children at school admission, mandating submission of four specific documents. This move, directed by the Allahabad High Court, aims to curb the misuse of the POCSO Act, where false age certificates have led to the false implication of boys aged 19 to 20 years in cases.
Full form of POCSO: Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
Allahabad HC Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost on UP Govt for Denying Minimum Wage of ₹18,000/Month to Forest Department Daily Wagers
The Allahabad High Court has upheld the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' for daily wage workers in the Uttar Pradesh Forest Department, rejecting the state government's appeals and imposing a cost of ₹1 lakh. The court ruled that the workers are entitled to the minimum wage of ₹18,000 per month applicable to regular Class IV employees, as established in the Puttilal case.
Court: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court on Ayodhya Land Acquisition: Flags Social Impact Assessment and Farmer Rights Under 2013 Land Acquisition Act
The Supreme Court, hearing a case on the acquisition of around 450 acres in Ayodhya, emphasized that Social Impact Assessment (SIA) should not be taken lightly, while also cautioning it must not become a 'noose around the state's neck'. The case centers on applying the safeguards of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, including SIA and restrictions on acquiring multi-crop irrigated land.
Full form of SIA: Social Impact Assessment

Uttar Pradesh Cybersecurity: IIT Kanpur to Develop ₹104.28 Cr SOC for 24x7 State Digital Asset Monitoring
The Uttar Pradesh Cabinet has approved a ₹104.28 crore project for a state-of-the-art Cyber Security Operations Centre (SOC). To be developed by IIT Kanpur's C3i Hub, the centre will provide 24x7 monitoring and protection for critical state digital assets like the State Data Centre and UP SWAN network against cyber attacks and data breaches.
Project Cost: ₹104.28 crore

Uttar Pradesh Inland Water Transport Rules 2026: Registration Mandatory on 11 Rivers, ₹50 Fee Per Boat
The Uttar Pradesh Cabinet has approved the Uttar Pradesh Inland Water Vessels Rules, 2026 to regulate and promote safe water transport on 11 major rivers. The rules mandate registration of all vessels, introduce a ₹50 fee per non-mechanical boat, and propose forming an Inland Water Authority chaired by the Transport Minister.
Full form of IWA: Inland Water Authority

Uttar Pradesh Proposes 'Singapore City' Near Noida Airport; ₹775 Cr FDI Project Approved, Targets 75,000 Acre Land Bank
Uttar Pradesh government has proposed developing a dedicated 'Singapore City' and high-tech industrial township near the upcoming Noida International Airport at Jewar to attract global supply chain hubs. This follows investment commitments of nearly ₹60,000 crore secured during the CM's Singapore visit in February 2026, with a new ₹775 crore FDI project also approved, creating 1,880 jobs.
Proposed Project: 'Singapore City' & High-Tech Industrial Township near Noida International Airport, Jewar

