State
Daily news about Madhya Pradesh in one place: government schemes, decisions, appointments and projects. For state exams and UPSC alike, each story comes with key points and questions.
This state's stories from the latest day.
Every story about this state, newest first.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has clarified that under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the 'theory of birthright' does not exist. A wife cannot be a coparcener, and sons cannot claim a share in ancestral property during the father's lifetime, especially if the property has become self-acquired through partition.
29 October 2026, 
A whole month of this state's stories on one page, for revision.
Questions from recent stories about Madhya Pradesh. One attempt per question.
Which landmark legislation, amended in 2005, governs the succession and property rights discussed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment?
Explanation: The article explicitly states that the court's ruling is based on the provisions and interpretation of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This is the primary statute governing intestate succession among Hindus, which was notably amended in 2005 to grant daughters equal coparcenary rights.
Consider the following statements regarding the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment:
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The article clearly states, 'the wife could not come within the category of coparceners.' Statement 2 is correct as the article mentions the court relied on 'Supreme Court’s decision in Uttam v Saubhag Singh.' Statement 3 is correct as the court held 'the property had become his self-acquired property upon partition.'
According to the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment discussed, in which year did the Hindu Succession Act come into force, ending the 'theory of birthright'?
Explanation: The article states: 'after the Hindu Succession Act came into force, the "theory of birthright does not exist".' The Hindu Succession Act was enacted in 1956. The year 2005 is when it was amended, not when it originally came into force.
What was the primary legal rationale used by the Madhya Pradesh High Court to deny the claim of the sons for a share in the property during their father's lifetime?
Explanation: The core of the court's reasoning, as per the article, is that 'after the Hindu Succession Act came into force, the "theory of birthright does not exist", and a son gets a share in the property only after the death of his father.' This is the fundamental legal principle applied to dismiss the claim for a share during the father's lifetime.
Hindu Succession Act 1956: No Birthright Claim in Ancestral Property During Father's Lifetime, Rules MP High Court (29 October 2026)
Polity (1)
The newest stories are from 29 October 2026. This page has 1 stories, newest first.
This page keeps every story about Madhya Pradesh in one place, newest first. Revise each story's key points, then take the quiz below.
State public service commission, state one-day and teacher recruitment exams all ask about the state. Major state schemes come up in UPSC too.
Yes, this page links to every month. Each month's page lists that month's Madhya Pradesh stories by date.
