International Relations

US Freedom of Navigation Ops (FONOPs) vs India: 3 Challenges in 2025, India Ranks 7th Globally, Key Disputes on EEZ & Territorial Sea

29 October 20264 min1 source4 questionsStory 4 of 67

For Prelims: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), Territorial Waters, Contiguous Zone, Full form of FONOPs, Full form of UNCLOS, US FON Programme started, India's rank in US FONOPs challenges (1991-2025)

For Mains: Strategic autonomy; Legal-diplomatic balancing; Paradox of cooperation and contestation; UNCLOS and customary international law

Source:Indian Express

Why in the news?

The United States conducted three Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs) challenging India's maritime claims in fiscal year 2025, the highest annual number recorded against India since 1991. This occurs despite deepening India-US naval cooperation, highlighting a persistent legal-strategic divergence over interpretations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) concerning prior consent for military activities in Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and prior notification for warships.

Summary

  • US challenged India's maritime claims three times in FY2025, the highest single-year count since public records began in 1991.
  • Key disputes include India's requirements for prior consent for military exercises in its EEZ and prior notification for warships in territorial waters, which the US contests under its interpretation of international law.
  • India ranks 7th among 75 countries most frequently challenged by US FONOPs, with the pattern suggesting operational frequency may be influenced by the broader bilateral strategic relationship.

Highlights

  • Highest Annual Challenge

    The US conducted three FONOPs against India in FY2025, the highest single-year count since 1991.

  • Core Legal Disputes

    The US contests India's requirements for prior consent for military exercises in its EEZ and prior notification for warships entering territorial waters.

  • Strategic Paradox

    Despite these operational challenges, India-US naval cooperation has expanded significantly with platforms like P-8I aircraft and agreements like LEMOA and COMCASA.

Context / Background

The US Freedom of Navigation (FON) Programme, begun in 1979, aims to challenge 'excessive maritime claims' by coastal states that Washington believes restrict freedom of navigation and overflight under international law. While the US has not ratified UNCLOS (adopted 1982), it recognizes many of its provisions as customary international law. The programme uses diplomatic protests and military operational assertions to demonstrate non-acceptance of unilateral restrictions.

Core Analysis & Implications

The three assertions against India in FY2025 targeted straight baselines around Lakshadweep, prior consent for military activities in the EEZ/continental shelf, and prior notification for vessels carrying hazardous cargo. India ranks 7th globally in US FONOPs challenges, ahead of allies like Japan and South Korea. The divergence in US operational frequency against China post-2016, coinciding with strategic competition, suggests FONOPs are not purely legal but reflect the broader bilateral political environment. For India, this creates a paradox: deep naval integration (P-8I, MH-60R, LEMOA, COMCASA, CMF membership) coexists with fundamental legal disagreements over maritime sovereignty.

Future Outlook / Way Forward

India's policy response, as suggested in the analysis, should combine legal clarity, diplomatic consistency, and periodic review of maritime cooperation. This includes systematically recording US challenges, clarifying India's legal position publicly, reviewing costs/benefits of participation in US-led arrangements like the Quad or Combined Maritime Forces, investing in indigenous Indian Ocean security architecture (IONS, IORA, IFC-IOR), and diversifying maritime partnerships to maintain strategic autonomy while engaging with the US.

Background GK

Textbook concepts you need to understand this news

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
The international agreement that defines the rights and responsibilities of nations concerning their use of the world's oceans, establishing guidelines for businesses, the environment, and the management of marine natural resources. It was adopted in 1982 and came into force in 1994.
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
A sea zone prescribed by UNCLOS over which a state has special rights regarding the exploration and use of marine resources, including energy production from water and wind. It stretches from the baseline to 200 nautical miles (370 km) from the coast.
Territorial Waters
A belt of coastal waters extending at most 12 nautical miles (22 km) from the baseline of a coastal state. The state has full sovereignty over these waters, including the airspace above and the seabed below, subject to the right of innocent passage for foreign vessels.
Contiguous Zone
A band of water extending from the outer edge of the territorial sea to up to 24 nautical miles (44 km) from the baseline. Within this zone, a state can exert limited control to prevent or punish infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration, or sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea.

Facts to remember

Tap a card to see the answer. Try to recall it first.

How exams will ask this

  • Data: 3 FONOPs against India in US FY2025 (highest annual count since 1991).
  • Nodal Body: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
  • Legal Point: India's Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976.

Don't make this mistake!

They may ask about the 'number of FONOPs in a recent year' (3 in FY2025) or India's 'global rank' (7th). A trap could be stating the US has 'ratified' UNCLOS (it has not) or confusing the start year of the US FON Programme (1979, not 1982). Another trap could be swapping the nature of disputes, e.g., saying the US supports prior notification for warships (it opposes it).

Write these in mains answers

  • Strategic autonomy
  • Legal-diplomatic balancing
  • Paradox of cooperation and contestation
  • UNCLOS and customary international law

Practice questions

Pick an answer, then read the explanation.

  1. Q1Easy

    The United States Freedom of Navigation Programme, which challenges excessive maritime claims, was initiated in which year?

  2. Q2Hard

    Consider the following statements regarding the US Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs) against India:

    1. 1.In fiscal year 2025, the US conducted three FONOPs challenging Indian maritime claims, which was the highest annual number recorded against India since 1991.
    2. 2.The principal US objection is to India's requirement for prior consent for commercial fishing activities within India's Exclusive Economic Zone.
    3. 3.India requires prior notification for foreign warships entering its territorial waters, a requirement the US contests under its interpretation of international law.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  3. Q3Medium

    According to the analysis of US operational assertions from 1991 to 2025, what is India's rank among the countries most frequently challenged by the US Freedom of Navigation Operations?

  4. Q4Medium

    What is the primary legal instrument, as per the article, under which India has established requirements such as prior notification for warships, which are contested by the United States?

Frequently asked questions

1. What is the full form of FONOPs?

Freedom of Navigation Operations

2. What is the full form of UNCLOS?

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

3. What is the uS FON Programme started?

March 1979

4. What is the india's rank in US FONOPs challenges (1991-2025)?

7th among 75 countries

5. What is the uS operational assertions (1991-2025)?

616 against 75 countries

6. What is the india's relevant domestic law?

Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976

7. What is the current context (FY2025)?

US conducted 3 FONOPs against India, the highest annual total recorded

All sources

Stories from the last 30 days on the same topic, state or exams

Polity
4 questions · 2 min

Supreme Court Clarifies Bail for Foreigners under UAPA: No Bar if Entry is Legal

The Supreme Court has ruled that there is no blanket prohibition on granting bail to foreign nationals under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The Court upheld that if a foreigner's entry into India was legal and authorized, the stringent bail conditions under Section 43D(7) of UAPA do not automatically apply, shifting the burden of proof regarding illegal entry onto the prosecution.

Full form of UAPA: Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act

UPSC8BPSC7UPPSC7+2
Hindustan
International Relations
4 questions · 3 min

UNSC Reforms: India Demands Veto Power for All Permanent Members, Cites 331 Vetoes Used on 200 Resolutions

India has reiterated its demand for comprehensive United Nations Security Council (UNSC) reforms, calling for veto power to be extended to all permanent members and highlighting the misuse of the veto privilege. India's Permanent Representative presented data showing 331 vetoes have been used on approximately 200 resolutions, with most concentrated among three of the P5 members.

Full form of UNSC: United Nations Security Council

UPSC8SSC7Defence7
Hindustan
International Relations
4 questions · 3 min

Korean Peninsula Tensions: North Korea's 10-Missile Barrage Post-Kim's China Visit

North Korea conducted a significant missile test, firing approximately 10 short-range ballistic missiles from Wonsan towards the sea. This action escalates tensions on the Korean Peninsula, following accusations of landmine attacks and threats to resume border propaganda broadcasts, and comes shortly after Kim Jong Un's diplomatic visit to China.

Date of Missile Launch: October 29, 2026

Defence8UPSC7
The Hindu
International Relations
2 questions · 3 min

India's 'Battle-Tested' Counter-Terrorism Expertise, UNCLOS Advocacy at ASEAN ADMM-Plus Meet in Philippines

India has offered to share its operationally proven counter-terrorism expertise with ASEAN and its partners, positioning itself as a 'trusted net security provider' in the Indo-Pacific. The stance underscores India's commitment to upholding UNCLOS and ensuring maritime security, especially in the context of challenges in the South China Sea.

Full form of ADMM-Plus: ASEAN Defence Ministers' Meeting Plus

Defence9UPSC8
The Hindu
International Relations
4 questions · 2 min

U.S. Proposes New U.S.-ASEAN Defence Cooperation Framework Amid South China Sea Tensions

The United States has proposed an 'ambitious' new defense cooperation framework with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to enhance security partnership in the Indo-Pacific. This move is aimed at countering China's growing military assertiveness in the South China Sea and strengthening maritime security and military coordination among allies.

Full form of ASEAN: Association of Southeast Asian Nations

Defence8UPSC7
The Hindu
Arunachal PradeshInternational Relations
4 questions · 3 min

Siang Upper Multipurpose Project: 11,200 MW Hydropower Plan in Arunachal to Counter Chinese Upstream Dams

The proposed 11,200 MW Siang Upper Multipurpose Project in Arunachal Pradesh, India's largest hydropower plan, faces strong local opposition from the Adi community over displacement and cultural loss. While the government cites national security to counter China's upstream dams on the Yarlung Tsangpo, experts question the strategic rationale without detailed knowledge of the Chinese project's operations.

Project Name: Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP)

UPSC8Defence7
Indian Express