Polity

Maharashtra Announces ₹5 Lakh Compensation for Custodial Deaths, ₹4 Lakh for Permanent Disability from Custodial Torture

27 October 20262 min1 source4 questionsStory 35 of 47

For Prelims: Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, Custodial Death, State Human Rights Commission (SHRC), Compensation for Custodial Death, Compensation for Permanent Disability (≥50%), Compensation for Permanent Disability (<50%), Nodal Department, Current Context

For Mains: Financial deterrence for police misconduct; Quantifying state liability for rights violations; Judicial activism leading to policy formulation

Source:Hindustan

Why in the news?

Maharashtra's Home Department announced a new compensation policy for victims of custodial deaths and torture a few days after the Maharashtra Cabinet approved it. The policy mandates ₹5 lakh for deaths in custody due to police assault or administrative negligence, and up to ₹4 lakh for permanent disability from custodial torture. This follows a 2014 Bombay High Court directive.

Summary

  • Maharashtra Home Department announces compensation policy for custodial deaths and torture victims.
  • Compensation amounts: ₹5 lakh for custodial deaths, up to ₹4 lakh for permanent disability (₹2 lakh for <50% disability, ₹4 lakh for ≥50% disability).
  • Policy excludes deaths from natural causes, natural disasters without institutional negligence, refusal of medical treatment, and accidents during escape attempts.

Highlights

  • Compensation Policy

    Maharashtra sets mandatory compensation for custodial deaths (₹5 lakh) and torture-induced permanent disability (up to ₹4 lakh).

  • Exclusions

    The policy excludes deaths from natural causes, accidents during escape, refusal of medical treatment, and natural disasters without institutional negligence.

  • Police Accountability

    If internal inquiry finds police guilty of assault or negligence, criminal cases will be filed against the personnel.

Context / Background

This policy is a direct response to a 2014 Bombay High Court directive on a petition, highlighting judicial intervention to address police accountability. It formalizes state responsibility for protecting the rights of individuals in custody, a key aspect of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Indian Constitution.

Core Analysis & Implications

The policy quantifies state liability for custodial violence, setting a financial deterrent for police misconduct. The tiered compensation for disability (₹2 lakh for <50%, ₹4 lakh for ≥50%) introduces a medical assessment-based approach. Mandating criminal cases against guilty personnel reinforces the principle that compensation does not replace criminal liability.

Future Outlook / Way Forward

The policy's effectiveness hinges on rigorous and impartial internal inquiries. It may set a precedent for other states to adopt similar structured compensation frameworks. Long-term impact depends on implementation and whether it reduces incidents of custodial violence.

Examiner's Angle: Link to Legal Framework

This news is directly linked to the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, under which State Human Rights Commissions can recommend compensation. It also relates to Supreme Court guidelines in D.K. Basu vs State of West Bengal (1997) on arrest and detention procedures.

Background GK

Textbook concepts you need to understand this news

Article 21 of the Indian Constitution
Protects the right to life and personal liberty. It has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the right to live with human dignity and protection from torture or cruel treatment.
Custodial Death
Death of a person who is under the custody of the police or in a prison. It raises serious concerns about police accountability and human rights violations.
State Human Rights Commission (SHRC)
A statutory body established under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. It can inquire into complaints of human rights violations within the state and recommend compensation to victims.

Facts to remember

Tap a card to see the answer. Try to recall it first.

How exams will ask this

  • Data: ₹5 lakh compensation for custodial death; ₹2 lakh for <50% disability, ₹4 lakh for ≥50% disability from torture.
  • Nodal Body: Maharashtra Home Department.
  • Legal Point: Policy based on 2014 Bombay High Court directive, linked to Article 21 and human rights.

Don't make this mistake!

Examiners may ask about the compensation amount for a specific disability percentage (e.g., 60% disability gets ₹4 lakh, not ₹2 lakh). They may also ask which situations are NOT covered, testing careful reading of exclusions like 'natural causes' or 'refusal of medical treatment'.

Write these in mains answers

  • Financial deterrence for police misconduct
  • Quantifying state liability for rights violations
  • Judicial activism leading to policy formulation

Practice questions

Pick an answer, then read the explanation.

  1. Q1Easy

    Which state department announced the new compensation policy for custodial deaths and torture victims?

  2. Q2Hard

    Consider the following statements regarding Maharashtra's new compensation policy for custodial incidents:

    1. 1.It provides ₹5 lakh compensation for death in custody due to police assault.
    2. 2.It provides ₹4 lakh compensation for any permanent disability caused by custodial torture.
    3. 3.The policy was formulated based on directives from the Supreme Court of India.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  3. Q3Medium

    According to Maharashtra's new policy, what is the compensation amount for a person who suffers 40% permanent disability due to custodial torture?

  4. Q4Medium

    What is a key objective behind Maharashtra's new compensation policy for custodial deaths and torture?

Frequently asked questions

1. What is the compensation for Custodial Death?

₹5 lakh

2. What is the compensation for Permanent Disability (≥50%)?

₹4 lakh

3. What is the compensation for Permanent Disability (<50%)?

₹2 lakh

4. What is the nodal Department?

Maharashtra Home Department

5. What is the current Context?

Policy announced after Maharashtra Cabinet approval, following 2014 Bombay HC directive.

All sources

Stories from the last 30 days on the same topic, state or exams

Polity
3 questions · 2 min

India Considers Policy Framework to Tackle Child Pornography and Non-Consensual Explicit Content, SC Hearing Adjourned for 4 Weeks

The Central Government has informed the Supreme Court that it is considering a legislative policy framework to combat child pornography and the spread of non-consensual explicit content involving adults. The framework may impose proactive reporting and takedown obligations on online intermediaries and allow complaints from third parties.

Current Context: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed Supreme Court bench of CJI Suryakant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana on October 27, 2026.

UPSC7
Hindustan
Polity
4 questions · 2 min

Supreme Court Collegium System: Calls for Transparent Roster and Defending Judicial Appointments Process

Former Supreme Court Justice A.S. Oka has emphasized the need for a fair roster system in the Supreme Court to eliminate Chief Justice of India's discretion in case allocation and has defended the existing Collegium system for judicial appointments. He argued that judicial accountability should be strengthened at all levels without compromising judicial independence, and that mere publication of proposals on the Supreme Court website does not ensure transparency in the Collegium's functioning.

Speaker: Former Supreme Court Justice A.S. Oka

UPSC7
Hindustan
Polity
3 questions · 3 min

India's Proposed Policy Framework to Curb Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) and Non-Consensual Explicit Content

The Central Government is considering a comprehensive policy framework to tackle online child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and the spread of non-consensual explicit content. The framework proposes to impose due diligence obligations on intermediaries, including mandatory removal of objectionable content and reporting to authorities. The government is also contemplating a statutory legislative mechanism for this purpose.

Government Representative: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta

UPSC7
Hindustan
Polity
3 questions · 2 min

Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023: SC Seeks Centre's Response to Challenge by DNPA on Sections 7, 17(2), 18, 19, 27, 29, 36, 37, 44(3)

The Supreme Court has sought the Centre's response to a legal challenge by the Digital News Publishers Association against specific sections of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act). The petition argues that certain provisions infringe on press freedom and could 'shut down newsrooms', seeking to declare nine sections and three related rules as unconstitutional.

Full form of DPDP Act: Digital Personal Data Protection Act

UPSC8SSC7
Hindustan