Polity

Motor Accident Compensation: High Court Treats 28-Week Foetus as Child, Awards ₹2.2 Lakh

12 November 20263 min1 source4 questionsStory 25 of 50

For Prelims: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Notional income, Multiplier method, Full bench

For Mains: Polity: Judiciary and judicial decisions; Governance: Motor accident compensation

Source:Indian ExpressIndian Express

The news

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that a 28-week-old foetus must be treated as a “child” for the purpose of awarding compensation in a road accident, granting approximately ₹2.2 lakh to a couple who lost their unborn baby after the pregnant woman was hit by a scooter. Justice Pramod Goyal passed the order on November 2, 2026, while hearing a plea by the parents challenging the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s 2000 decision that had dismissed their compensation claim for the unborn child. The court held that the tribunal had erred in rejecting the claim solely on the ground that compensation for the loss of an unborn child was not maintainable.

The accident occurred on June 8, 1997, when the 28-week-pregnant woman and her husband were returning home from Chandigarh’s Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research on their motorcycle. After stopping due to a road block, the woman got down and was struck by a scooter, dragged eight to 10 feet, and sustained multiple injuries while her unborn child died. The tribunal had found the scooter driver’s driving rash and negligent but dismissed the claim. In calculating compensation, the court used the 1997 minimum wage for an unskilled worker as notional income, added 40 per cent for future prospects, deducted 50 per cent for personal expenses, and applied a multiplier of nine to determine loss of dependency. The court also noted that the Kerala High Court’s full bench has recognised a foetus beyond six months as a viable child for such compensation.

Why in the news?

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on November 2, 2026, treated a 28-week foetus as a child for motor accident compensation, overturning a 2000 tribunal rejection and awarding ₹2.2 lakh to the parents.

What did the tribunal decide and why was it overturned?

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in May 2000 dismissed the parents' claim, holding that compensation for the loss of an unborn child was not maintainable. The High Court found this reasoning erroneous, stating that a 28-week-old foetus must be treated as a child for the purpose of awarding compensation in a road accident. The court referred to the Kerala High Court’s full-bench position that a foetus beyond six months of pregnancy could be treated as a viable child, making parents eligible for compensation in the event of its death in a road accident.

How was the compensation amount calculated?

The court based the notional income of the unborn child on the minimum wage applicable to an unskilled worker in 1997. It added 40 per cent towards future prospects, deducted 50 per cent towards personal expenses, and adopted a multiplier of nine to calculate the loss of dependency. The resulting award was approximately ₹2.2 lakh. The court specified that the multiplier of nine was appropriate for an unborn child for determining loss of earning capacity.

Facts and terms for exams

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal:
A tribunal that adjudicates claims for compensation arising from motor vehicle accidents.
Notional income:
An estimated income used in a compensation calculation when actual earnings cannot be determined.
Multiplier method:
A method of estimating compensation by applying a numerical multiplier to the assessed loss of dependency.
Full bench:
A bench of a court comprising a larger number of judges than an ordinary bench, constituted to decide a legal question.

Why it matters for exams

Exams: HPSC HCS

Syllabus: Polity: Judiciary and judicial decisions; Governance: Motor accident compensation

Common mistake: Examiners may swap the 40% addition for future prospects with the 50% personal-expense deduction; the former increases assessed income and the latter reduces it. The ruling treated the foetus as a child for accident compensation, not for every legal purpose.

Mains question

Discuss the legal and ethical considerations in treating a foetus as a child for compensation in motor accident claims, with reference to recent judicial precedents.

Stuck? Get it in one tap

Practice questions

Pick an answer, then read the explanation.

  1. Q1Easy

    Which body initially rejected the parents' compensation claim for the unborn child in the 1997 road accident case?

  2. Q2Hard

    Consider the following statements about the Punjab and Haryana High Court's compensation ruling:

    1. 1.The foetus was 28 weeks old at the time of the accident.
    2. 2.The court deducted 40% for personal expenses and added 50% for future prospects.
    3. 3.The court applied a multiplier of nine for loss of dependency.

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

  3. Q3Medium

    Approximately how much compensation did the Punjab and Haryana High Court award the parents for the unborn child's death in the 1997 accident?

  4. Q4Medium

    Why did the Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the tribunal's rejection of the unborn child's compensation claim?

Frequently asked questions

1. How much compensation was awarded for the unborn child's death in the 1997 accident?

Approximately ₹2.2 lakh was awarded to the parents.

2. What multiplier did the Punjab and Haryana High Court use for the unborn child?

A multiplier of nine was used to calculate loss of dependency.

3. What income did the court use to calculate compensation for the unborn child?

The court used the 1997 minimum wage applicable to an unskilled worker as notional income.

4. Why had the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the parents' claim?

The tribunal held that compensation for the loss of an unborn child was not maintainable. The High Court found that reasoning erroneous.

All sources

Stories from the last 30 days on the same topic, state or exams

PolityHaryanaHPSC HCS: Important

HSSPP delegates ₹1 lakh financial powers, restructures block administration

  • Full form of HSSPP: Haryana School Shiksha Pariyojana Parishad (HSSPP) — Haryana School Education Project Council.
  • Nodal body: Haryana School Shiksha Pariyojana Parishad (HSSPP).
Background GK: Samagra ShikshaNodal: Haryana School Shiksha Pariyojana Parishad (HSSPP)Don't make this mistake!
4 questions · 2 minDainik Bhaskar
PolityUttarakhandUKPSC: Very important

Uttarakhand banks given 15 days for cybercrime deployment

  • Responsible state authority: Government of Uttarakhand
  • Deployment deadline: Within 15 days
Background GK: Credit-deposit ratioNodal: Government of UttarakhandDon't make this mistake!
4 questions · 4 minDainik Bhaskar
PolityRajasthanRPSC RAS: Important

Rajasthan HC bars roll revision after election process begins

  • Responsible body: Rajasthan State Election Commission
  • Panchayat and district: Mendi Gram Panchayat, Bundi
Background GK: Electoral rollNodal: Rajasthan State Election CommissionDon't make this mistake!
4 questions · 4 minDainik Bhaskar